Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update scalacheck to 1.18.1 #1541

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

broadbot
Copy link
Contributor

About this PR

πŸ“¦ Updates org.scalacheck:scalacheck from 1.14.3 to 1.18.1

πŸ“œ GitHub Release Notes

Usage

βœ… Please merge!

I'll automatically update this PR to resolve conflicts as long as you don't change it yourself.

If you'd like to skip this version, you can just close this PR. If you have any feedback, just mention me in the comments below.

Configure Scala Steward for your repository with a .scala-steward.conf file.

Have a fantastic day writing Scala!

βš™ Adjust future updates

Add this to your .scala-steward.conf file to ignore future updates of this dependency:

updates.ignore = [ { groupId = "org.scalacheck", artifactId = "scalacheck" } ]

Or, add this to slow down future updates of this dependency:

dependencyOverrides = [{
  pullRequests = { frequency = "30 days" },
  dependency = { groupId = "org.scalacheck", artifactId = "scalacheck" }
}]
❗ Note that the Scala Steward config file `.scala-steward.conf` wasn't parsed correctly
DecodingFailure at .pullRequests.frequency: cron4s.InvalidCron: Either DayOfMonth and DayOfWeek must have a ? expression
labels: test-library-update, early-semver-minor, semver-spec-minor, version-scheme:early-semver, commit-count:1

Copy link

@davidangb
Copy link
Contributor

superseded by #1568

@davidangb davidangb closed this Oct 17, 2024
@davidangb davidangb deleted the update/scalacheck-1.18.1 branch October 17, 2024 16:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants